IPAC2022 - List of Authors (Vretenar, M.)

Paper	Title	Page
TUOXSP3	Evaluation of Geometrical Precision and Surface Roughness Quality for the Additively Manufactured Radio Frequency Quadrupole Prototype	787
	T. Torims, D. Krogere, G. Pikurs, A. Ratkus Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia A. Cherif, M. Vretenar CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland N. Delerue Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France M. Foppa Pedretti, M. Pozzi Rösler Italiana s.r.l., Concorezzo, Italy S. Gruber, E. Lopez Fraunhofer IWS, Dresden, Germany T. Otto TalTech, Tallinn, Estonia M. Thielmann, P. Wagenblast TRUMPF, Ditzingen, Germany M. Vedani POLIMI, Milano, Italy
	A multidisciplinary collaboration within the I.FAST project teamed-up to develop additive manufacturing (AM) technology solutions for accelerators. The first prototype of an AM pure-copper radio frequency quadrupole (RFQ) has been produced, corresponding to 1/4 of a 4-vane RFQ. It was optimised for production with state-of-the-art laser powder bed fusion technology. Geometrical precision and roughness of the critical surfaces were measured. Alt-hough the obtained values were beyond standard RFQ specifications, these first results are promising and con-firmed the feasibility of AM manufactured complex cop-per accelerator cavities. Therefore, further post-processing trials have been conducted with the sample RFQ to im-prove surface roughness. Algorithms for the AM techno-logical processes have also been improved, allowing for higher geometrical precision. This resulted in the design of a full 4-vane RFQ prototype. At the time of the paper submission the full-size RFQ is being manufactured and will undergo through the stringent surface quality meas-urements. This paper is discussing novel technological developments, is providing an evaluation of the obtained surface roughness and geometrical precision as well as outlining the potential post-processing scenarios along with future tests plans. Torims T, et al. First Proof-of-Concept Prototype of an Additive Manufactured Radio Frequency Quadrupole. Instruments. 2021; 5(4):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments5040035
	Slides TUOXSP3 [10.031 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUOXSP3
About •	Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 11 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 12 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 10 July 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUOZGD2	A Compact Synchrotron for Advanced Cancer Therapy with Helium and Proton Beams	811
THPOMS021	use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code
	M. Vretenar, M.E. Angoletta, J.C.C.M. Borburgh, L. Bottura, K. Paļskis, R.L. Taylor, G. Tranquille CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland E. Benedetto SEEIIST, Geneva, Switzerland G. Bisoffi INFN/LNL, Legnaro (PD), Italy M. Sapinski PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
	Recent years have seen an increased interest in the use of helium for radiation therapy of cancer. Helium ions can be more precisely delivered to the tumour than protons or carbon ions, presently the only beams licensed for treatment, with a biological effectiveness between the two. The accelerator required for helium is considerably smaller than a standard carbon ion synchrotron. To exploit the potential of helium therapy and of other emerging particle therapy techniques, in the framework of the Next Ion Medical Machine Study (NIMMS) at CERN the design of a compact synchrotron optimised for acceleration of proton and helium beams has been investigated. The synchrotron is based on a new magnet design, profits from a novel injector linac, and can provide both slow and fast extraction for conventional and FLASH therapy. Production of mini-beams, and operation with multiple ions for imaging and treatment are also considered. This accelerator is intended to become the main element of a facility devoted to a programme of cancer research and treatment with proton and helium beams, to both cure patients and contribute to the assessment of helium beams as a new tool to fight cancer.
	Slides TUOZGD2 [1.940 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUOZGD2
About •	Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 11 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 16 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 11 July 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEINGD1	Industry and Accelerator Science, Technology, and Engineering - the Need to Integrate (Building Bridges)	1644
	R. Geometrante KYMA, Trieste, Italy S. Biedron Element Aero, Chicago, USA E. Braidotti CAEN ELS srl, Trieste, Italy J.M.A. Priem VDL ETG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands J.C. Rugsancharoenphol FTI, Bangkok, Thailand S.L. Sheehy The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia M. Vretenar CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
	Abstract
	Slides WEINGD1 [36.079 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEINGD1
About •	Received ※ 05 July 2022 — Accepted ※ 04 July 2022 — Issue date ※ 05 July 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS012	Explorative Studies of an Innovative Superconducting Gantry	2966
	M.G. Pullia, M. Donetti, E. Felcini, G. Frisella, A. Mereghetti, A. Mirandola, A. Pella, S. Savazzi CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy E. Benedetto SEEIIST, Geneva, Switzerland L. Dassa, M. Karppinen, D. Perini, D. Tommasini, M. Vretenar CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland E. De Matteis, L. Rossi INFN/LASA, Segrate (MI), Italy C. Kurfürst, M.T.F. Pivi, M. Stock EBG MedAustron, Wr. Neustadt, Austria S. Mariotto, M. Prioli INFN-Milano, Milano, Italy L. Piacentini, A. Ratkus, T. Torims, J. Vilcans Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia L. Sabbatini, A. Vannozzi LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy S. Uberti Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
	Funding: This study was (partially) supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 101008548 (HITRIplus). The Heavy Ion Therapy Research Integration plus (HITRIplus) is a European project that aims to integrate and propel research and technologies related to cancer treatment with heavy ions beams. Among the ambitious goals of the project, a specific work package includes the design of a gantry for carbon ions, based on superconducting magnets. The first milestone to achieve is the choice of the fundamental gantry parameters, namely the beam optics layout, the superconducting magnet technology, and the main user requirements. Starting from a reference 3T design, the collaboration widely explored dozens of possible gantry configurations at 4T, aiming to find the best compromise in terms of footprint, capital cost, and required R&D. We present here a summary of these configurations, underlying the initial correlation between the beam optics, the mechanics, and the main superconducting dipoles design: the bending field (up to 4 T), combined function features (integrated quadrupole), magnet aperture (up to 90 mm), and angular length (30°-45°). The resulting main parameters are then listed, compared, and used to drive the choice of the best gantry layout to be developed in HITRIplus.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS012
About •	Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 12 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 13 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 16 June 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS022	Production of Radioisotopes for Cancer Imaging and Treatment with Compact Linear Accelerators	2996
	M. Vretenar, A. Mamaras CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland G. Bisoffi INFN/LNL, Legnaro (PD), Italy P. Foka GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
	Accelerator-produced radioisotopes are widely used in modern medicine, for imaging, for cancer therapy, and for combinations of therapy and diagnostics. Clinical trials are well advanced for several radioisotope-based treatments that might open the way to a strong request of specific accelerator systems dedicated to radioisotope production. While cyclotrons are the standard tool in this domain, we explore here alternative options using linear accelerators. Compared to cyclotrons, linacs have the advantage of modularity, compactness, and reduced beam loss with lower shielding requirements. Although in general more expensive than cyclotrons, linacs are competitive in cost for production of low-energy proton beams, or of intense beams of heavier particles. After a review of radioisotopes of potential interest, in particular those produced with low-energy protons or helium, this paper presents two linac-based isotope production systems. The first is a compact RFQ-based system for PET isotopes, and the second is an alpha-particle linac for production of alpha-emitters. The accelerator systems are described, together with calculations of production yields for different targets.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS022
About •	Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 15 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 16 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 17 June 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS048	Challenge Based Innovation "Accelerators for the Environment"	3077
	N. Delerue Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France P. Burrows JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom R. Holland, L. Rinolfi ESI, Archamps, France E. Métral, M. Vretenar CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
	Funding: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 101004730. We present an initiative to foster new ideas about the applications of accelerators to the Environment. Called "Challenge Based Innovation" this initiative will gather four teams each of six master-level students each coming from different academic backgrounds. As part of the EU-funded I.FAST project (Innovation Fostering in Accelerator Science and Technology), they will gather during 10 days in Archamps near CERN to receive high level lectures on accelerators and the environment and to brainstorm on possible new applications of accelerators for the environment. At the end of the gathering, they will present their project at CERN to a jury made of experts.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS048
About •	Received ※ 09 June 2022 — Revised ※ 10 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 20 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 01 July 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS049	Energy Comparison of Room Temperature and Superconducting Synchrotrons for Hadron Therapy	3080
	G. Bisoffi INFN/LNL, Legnaro (PD), Italy E. Benedetto, M. Karppinen, M.R. Khalvati, M. Vretenar, R. van Weelderen CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland M.G. Pullia, G. Venchi CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy L. Rossi INFN/LASA, Segrate (MI), Italy M. Sapinski PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland M. Sorbi Universita’ degli Studi di Milano & INFN, Segrate, Italy R.U. Valente La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
	The yearly energy requirements of normal conducting (NC) and superconducting (SC) magnet options of a new hadron therapy (HT) facility are compared. Special reference is made to the layouts considered for the proposed SEEIIST facility. Benchmarking with the NC CNAO HT centre in Pavia (Italy) was carried out. The energy comparison is centred on the different synchrotron solutions, assuming the same injector and lines in the designs. The beam current is more than a factor 10 higher with respect to present generation facilities. This allows efficient ’multi-energy extraction’ (MEE), which shortens the therapy treatment and is needed especially in the SC option, because of the slow magnet ramping time. Hence, power values of the facility in the traditional mode were converted into MEE ones, for the sake of a fair stepwise comparison between NC and SC magnets. The use of cryocoolers and a liquefier are also compared, for synchrotron refrigeration. This study shows that a NC facility operated in MEE mode requires the least average energy, followed by the SC synchrotron solution with a liquefier, while the most energy intensive solution is the SC one with cryocoolers.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS049
About •	Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 17 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 28 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 10 July 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

Evaluation of Geometrical Precision and Surface Roughness Quality for the Additively Manufactured Radio Frequency Quadrupole Prototype

787

T. Torims, D. Krogere, G. Pikurs, A. Ratkus
Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
A. Cherif, M. Vretenar
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
N. Delerue
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
M. Foppa Pedretti, M. Pozzi
Rösler Italiana s.r.l., Concorezzo, Italy
S. Gruber, E. Lopez
Fraunhofer IWS, Dresden, Germany
T. Otto
TalTech, Tallinn, Estonia
M. Thielmann, P. Wagenblast
TRUMPF, Ditzingen, Germany
M. Vedani
POLIMI, Milano, Italy

A multidisciplinary collaboration within the I.FAST project teamed-up to develop additive manufacturing (AM) technology solutions for accelerators. The first prototype of an AM pure-copper radio frequency quadrupole (RFQ) has been produced, corresponding to 1/4 of a 4-vane RFQ*. It was optimised for production with state-of-the-art laser powder bed fusion technology. Geometrical precision and roughness of the critical surfaces were measured. Alt-hough the obtained values were beyond standard RFQ specifications, these first results are promising and con-firmed the feasibility of AM manufactured complex cop-per accelerator cavities. Therefore, further post-processing trials have been conducted with the sample RFQ to im-prove surface roughness. Algorithms for the AM techno-logical processes have also been improved, allowing for higher geometrical precision. This resulted in the design of a full 4-vane RFQ prototype. At the time of the paper submission the full-size RFQ is being manufactured and will undergo through the stringent surface quality meas-urements. This paper is discussing novel technological developments, is providing an evaluation of the obtained surface roughness and geometrical precision as well as outlining the potential post-processing scenarios along with future tests plans.
* Torims T, et al. First Proof-of-Concept Prototype of an Additive Manufactured Radio Frequency Quadrupole. Instruments. 2021; 5(4):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments5040035

Slides TUOXSP3 [10.031 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUOXSP3

About •

Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 11 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 12 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 10 July 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUOZGD2

A Compact Synchrotron for Advanced Cancer Therapy with Helium and Proton Beams

811

THPOMS021

use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code

M. Vretenar, M.E. Angoletta, J.C.C.M. Borburgh, L. Bottura, K. Paļskis, R.L. Taylor, G. Tranquille
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
E. Benedetto
SEEIIST, Geneva, Switzerland
G. Bisoffi
INFN/LNL, Legnaro (PD), Italy
M. Sapinski
PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland

Recent years have seen an increased interest in the use of helium for radiation therapy of cancer. Helium ions can be more precisely delivered to the tumour than protons or carbon ions, presently the only beams licensed for treatment, with a biological effectiveness between the two. The accelerator required for helium is considerably smaller than a standard carbon ion synchrotron. To exploit the potential of helium therapy and of other emerging particle therapy techniques, in the framework of the Next Ion Medical Machine Study (NIMMS) at CERN the design of a compact synchrotron optimised for acceleration of proton and helium beams has been investigated. The synchrotron is based on a new magnet design, profits from a novel injector linac, and can provide both slow and fast extraction for conventional and FLASH therapy. Production of mini-beams, and operation with multiple ions for imaging and treatment are also considered. This accelerator is intended to become the main element of a facility devoted to a programme of cancer research and treatment with proton and helium beams, to both cure patients and contribute to the assessment of helium beams as a new tool to fight cancer.

Slides TUOZGD2 [1.940 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUOZGD2

About •

Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 11 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 16 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 11 July 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEINGD1

Industry and Accelerator Science, Technology, and Engineering - the Need to Integrate (Building Bridges)

1644

R. Geometrante
KYMA, Trieste, Italy
S. Biedron
Element Aero, Chicago, USA
E. Braidotti
CAEN ELS srl, Trieste, Italy
J.M.A. Priem
VDL ETG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
J.C. Rugsancharoenphol
FTI, Bangkok, Thailand
S.L. Sheehy
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
M. Vretenar
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland

Abstract

Slides WEINGD1 [36.079 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEINGD1

About •

Received ※ 05 July 2022 — Accepted ※ 04 July 2022 — Issue date ※ 05 July 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS012

Explorative Studies of an Innovative Superconducting Gantry

2966

M.G. Pullia, M. Donetti, E. Felcini, G. Frisella, A. Mereghetti, A. Mirandola, A. Pella, S. Savazzi
CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
E. Benedetto
SEEIIST, Geneva, Switzerland
L. Dassa, M. Karppinen, D. Perini, D. Tommasini, M. Vretenar
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
E. De Matteis, L. Rossi
INFN/LASA, Segrate (MI), Italy
C. Kurfürst, M.T.F. Pivi, M. Stock
EBG MedAustron, Wr. Neustadt, Austria
S. Mariotto, M. Prioli
INFN-Milano, Milano, Italy
L. Piacentini, A. Ratkus, T. Torims, J. Vilcans
Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
L. Sabbatini, A. Vannozzi
LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy
S. Uberti
Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Funding: This study was (partially) supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 101008548 (HITRIplus).
The Heavy Ion Therapy Research Integration plus (HITRIplus) is a European project that aims to integrate and propel research and technologies related to cancer treatment with heavy ions beams. Among the ambitious goals of the project, a specific work package includes the design of a gantry for carbon ions, based on superconducting magnets. The first milestone to achieve is the choice of the fundamental gantry parameters, namely the beam optics layout, the superconducting magnet technology, and the main user requirements. Starting from a reference 3T design, the collaboration widely explored dozens of possible gantry configurations at 4T, aiming to find the best compromise in terms of footprint, capital cost, and required R&D. We present here a summary of these configurations, underlying the initial correlation between the beam optics, the mechanics, and the main superconducting dipoles design: the bending field (up to 4 T), combined function features (integrated quadrupole), magnet aperture (up to 90 mm), and angular length (30°-45°). The resulting main parameters are then listed, compared, and used to drive the choice of the best gantry layout to be developed in HITRIplus.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS012

About •

Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 12 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 13 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 16 June 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS022

Production of Radioisotopes for Cancer Imaging and Treatment with Compact Linear Accelerators

2996

M. Vretenar, A. Mamaras
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
G. Bisoffi
INFN/LNL, Legnaro (PD), Italy
P. Foka
GSI, Darmstadt, Germany

Accelerator-produced radioisotopes are widely used in modern medicine, for imaging, for cancer therapy, and for combinations of therapy and diagnostics. Clinical trials are well advanced for several radioisotope-based treatments that might open the way to a strong request of specific accelerator systems dedicated to radioisotope production. While cyclotrons are the standard tool in this domain, we explore here alternative options using linear accelerators. Compared to cyclotrons, linacs have the advantage of modularity, compactness, and reduced beam loss with lower shielding requirements. Although in general more expensive than cyclotrons, linacs are competitive in cost for production of low-energy proton beams, or of intense beams of heavier particles. After a review of radioisotopes of potential interest, in particular those produced with low-energy protons or helium, this paper presents two linac-based isotope production systems. The first is a compact RFQ-based system for PET isotopes, and the second is an alpha-particle linac for production of alpha-emitters. The accelerator systems are described, together with calculations of production yields for different targets.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS022

About •

Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 15 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 16 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 17 June 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS048

Challenge Based Innovation "Accelerators for the Environment"

3077

N. Delerue
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
P. Burrows
JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom
R. Holland, L. Rinolfi
ESI, Archamps, France
E. Métral, M. Vretenar
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland

Funding: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 101004730.
We present an initiative to foster new ideas about the applications of accelerators to the Environment. Called "Challenge Based Innovation" this initiative will gather four teams each of six master-level students each coming from different academic backgrounds. As part of the EU-funded I.FAST project (Innovation Fostering in Accelerator Science and Technology), they will gather during 10 days in Archamps near CERN to receive high level lectures on accelerators and the environment and to brainstorm on possible new applications of accelerators for the environment. At the end of the gathering, they will present their project at CERN to a jury made of experts.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS048

About •

Received ※ 09 June 2022 — Revised ※ 10 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 20 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 01 July 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPOMS049

Energy Comparison of Room Temperature and Superconducting Synchrotrons for Hadron Therapy

3080

G. Bisoffi
INFN/LNL, Legnaro (PD), Italy
E. Benedetto, M. Karppinen, M.R. Khalvati, M. Vretenar, R. van Weelderen
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
M.G. Pullia, G. Venchi
CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
L. Rossi
INFN/LASA, Segrate (MI), Italy
M. Sapinski
PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
M. Sorbi
Universita’ degli Studi di Milano & INFN, Segrate, Italy
R.U. Valente
La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

The yearly energy requirements of normal conducting (NC) and superconducting (SC) magnet options of a new hadron therapy (HT) facility are compared. Special reference is made to the layouts considered for the proposed SEEIIST facility. Benchmarking with the NC CNAO HT centre in Pavia (Italy) was carried out. The energy comparison is centred on the different synchrotron solutions, assuming the same injector and lines in the designs. The beam current is more than a factor 10 higher with respect to present generation facilities. This allows efficient ’multi-energy extraction’ (MEE), which shortens the therapy treatment and is needed especially in the SC option, because of the slow magnet ramping time. Hence, power values of the facility in the traditional mode were converted into MEE ones, for the sake of a fair stepwise comparison between NC and SC magnets. The use of cryocoolers and a liquefier are also compared, for synchrotron refrigeration. This study shows that a NC facility operated in MEE mode requires the least average energy, followed by the SC synchrotron solution with a liquefier, while the most energy intensive solution is the SC one with cryocoolers.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS049

About •

Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 17 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 28 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 10 July 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)