Paper |
Title |
Page |
TUPOST045 |
Overview of the Machine Learning and Numerical Optimiser Applications on Beam Transfer Systems for LHC and Its Injectors |
961 |
|
- F.M. Velotti, M.J. Barnes, E. Carlier, Y. Dutheil, M.A. Fraser, B. Goddard, N. Magnin, R.L. Ramjiawan, E. Renner, P. Van Trappen
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
- E. Waagaard
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
|
|
|
Machine learning and numerical optimisation algorithms are getting more and more popular in the accelerator physics community and, thanks to the computing power available, their application in daily operation more likely. In the CERN accelerator complex, and specifically on the beam transfer systems, many promising exploitation of these numerical tools have been put in place in the last years. Some of the state-of-the-art machine learning models have been explored and used to solve problems that were never fully addressed in the past. In this paper, the most recent results of application of machine learning and numerical optimisation for injection, extraction and transfer of beam from machine and to experimental areas are presented. An overview of the possible next steps and shortcomings is finally discussed.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUPOST045
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 06 June 2022 — Revised ※ 14 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 16 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 10 July 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
WEPOST011 |
Studies on Top-Up Injection into the FCC-ee Collider Ring |
1699 |
SUSPMF006 |
|
|
- P.J. Hunchak, M.J. Boland
CLS, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
- M. Aiba
PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- W. Bartmann, Y. Dutheil, M. Hofer, R.L. Ramjiawan, F. Zimmermann
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
- M.J. Boland
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
|
|
|
In order to maximize the luminosity production time in the FCC-ee, top-up injection will be employed. The positron and electron beams will be accelerated to the collision energy in the booster ring before being injected with either a small transverse or longitudinal separation to the stored beam. Using this scheme essentially keeps the beam current constant and, apart from a brief period during the injection process, collision data can be continuously acquired. Two top-up injection schemes, each with on- and off-momentum sub-schemes, viable for FCC-ee have been identified in the past and are studied in further detail to find a suitable design for each of the four operation modes of the FCC-ee. In this paper, injection straight optics, initial injection tracking studies and the effect on the stored beam are presented. Additionally, a basic proxy error lattice is introduced as a first step to studying injection into an imperfect machine.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEPOST011
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 08 June 2022 — Revised ※ 13 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 16 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 19 June 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
WEPOPT063 |
The FCCee Pre-Injector Complex |
2007 |
|
- P. Craievich, B. Auchmann, S. Bettoni, H.-H. Braun, M. Duda, D. Hauenstein, E. Hohmann, R. Ischebeck, P.N. Juranič, J. Kosse, G.L. Orlandi, M. Pedrozzi, J.-Y. Raguin, S. Reiche, S.T. Sanfilippo, M. Schaer, N. Vallis, R. Zennaro
PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- F. Alharthi, I. Chaikovska, S. Ogur
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
- W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, M.I. Besana, M. Calviani, S. Döbert, Y. Dutheil, O. Etisken, J.L. Grenard, A. Grudiev, B. Humann, A. Latina, A. Lechner, K. Oide, A. Perillo-Marcone, H.W. Pommerenke, R.L. Ramjiawan, Y. Zhao, F. Zimmermann
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
- A. De Santis
INFN/LNF, Frascati, Italy
- Y. Enomoto, K. Furukawa, K. Oide
KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
- O. Etisken
Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey
- C. Milardi
LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy
- T.O. Raubenheimer
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
- N. Vallis
EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
|
|
|
The international FCC study group published in 2019 a Conceptual Design Report for an electron-positron collider with a centre-of-mass energy from 90 to 365 GeV with a beam currents of up to 1.4 A per beam. The high beam current of this collider create challenging requirements on the injection chain and all aspects of the linac need to be carefully reconsidered and revisited, including the injection time structure. The entire beam dynamics studies for the full linac, damping ring and transfer lines are major activities of the injector complex design. A key point is that any increase of positron production and capture efficiency reduces the cost and complexity of the driver linac, the heat and radiation load of the converter system, and increases the operational margin. In this paper we will give an overview of the status of the injector complex design and introduce the new layout that has been proposed by the study group working in the context of the CHART collaboration. In this framework, furthermore, we also present the preliminary studies of the FCC-ee positron source highlighting the main requirements and constraints.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEPOPT063
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 11 June 2022 — Revised ※ 14 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 17 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 29 June 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
WEPOTK025 |
Concepts and Considerations for FCC-ee Top-Up Injection Strategies |
2106 |
|
- R.L. Ramjiawan, W. Bartmann, Y. Dutheil, M. Hofer
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
- M. Aiba
PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- P.J. Hunchak
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
- P.J. Hunchak
CLS, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
|
|
The Future Circular electron-positron Collider (FCC-ee) is proposed to operate in four modes, with beam energies from 45.6 GeV (Z-pole) to 182.5 GeV (tt-bar production) and luminosities up to 4.6×1036 cm2s-1. At the highest energies the beam lifetime would be less than one hour, meaning that top-up injection will be crucial to maximise the integrated luminosity. Two top-up injection strategies are considered here: conventional injection, employing a closed orbit bump and septum, and multipole-kicker injection, with a pulsed multipole magnet and septum. On-axis and off-axis injections are considered for both. We present a comparison of these injection strategies taking into account aspects such as spatial constraints, machine protection, disturbance to the stored beam and injection efficiency. We overview potential kicker and septum technologies for each.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEPOTK025
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 03 June 2022 — Revised ※ 13 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 14 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 14 June 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
TUPOST011 |
Simulation Studies of Intra-Train, Bunch-by-Bunch Feedback Systems at the International Linear Collider |
861 |
|
- R.L. Ramjiawan, D.R. Bett, P. Burrows, C. Perry
JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom
- D.R. Bett
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
- R.M. Bodenstein
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
- G.B. Christian
DLS, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
|
|
|
The International Linear Collider (ILC) is a proposed electron-positron collider targeting collision energies from 250 GeV to 1 TeV. With design luminosities of order 1034 cm2s-1, a beam-based, intra-train feedback system would be required near the Interaction Point (IP) to provide nanometre-level stabilisation of the beam overlap in the collisions. Here we present results from beam-tracking simulations of the 500 GeV ILC, including the impact of beam-trajectory imperfections on the luminosity, and the capability of the IP feedback system to compensate for them. Effects investigated include the position jitter introduced by the damping ring extraction kicker, short-range and long-range wakefields, and ground motion. The feedback system was shown to be able to correct for beam-beam offsets of up to 200 nm and stabilise the collision overlap to the nanometre level, within a few bunch crossings.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUPOST011
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 03 June 2022 — Revised ※ 11 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 14 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 22 June 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
WEPOST026 |
Conceptual Design of the FCC-ee Beam Dumping System |
1753 |
SUSPMF002 |
|
|
- A.M. Krainer, P. Andreu Muñoz, W. Bartmann, M. Calviani, Y. Dutheil, A. Lechner, F.-X. Nuiry, A. Perillo-Marcone
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
- R.L. Ramjiawan
JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom
|
|
|
The Future Circular electron-positron Collider (FCC-ee) will have stored beam energies of up to 20 MJ. This is a factor 100 higher than any current or past lepton collider. A safe and reliable disposal of the beam onto a beam dump block is therefore critical for operation. To ensure the survival of the dump core blocks, transversal dilution of the beam is necessary. To reduce the complexity of the system and guarantee high availability, an optimized, semi-passive beam dumping system has been designed. The main dump absorber design has been optimized following recent studies for high energy dump block materials for the LHC High Luminosity upgrade. First simulations regarding the radiation environment of the dumping system have been carried out, allowing the definition of preliminary constraints for the integration with respect to radiation sensitive equipment. The performance of the system has been evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulations as well as thermomechanical Finite-Element-Analysis to investigate potential material failure and assess safety margins. An experiment at the CERN HiRadMat facility has been carried out and preliminary results show good agreement with simulations.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEPOST026
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 07 June 2022 — Revised ※ 16 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 16 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 25 June 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|