Author: Mariotto, S.
Paper Title Page
THPOMS012 Explorative Studies of an Innovative Superconducting Gantry 2966
 
  • M.G. Pullia, M. Donetti, E. Felcini, G. Frisella, A. Mereghetti, A. Mirandola, A. Pella, S. Savazzi
    CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
  • E. Benedetto
    SEEIIST, Geneva, Switzerland
  • L. Dassa, M. Karppinen, D. Perini, D. Tommasini, M. Vretenar
    CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
  • E. De Matteis, L. Rossi
    INFN/LASA, Segrate (MI), Italy
  • C. Kurfürst, M.T.F. Pivi, M. Stock
    EBG MedAustron, Wr. Neustadt, Austria
  • S. Mariotto, M. Prioli
    INFN-Milano, Milano, Italy
  • L. Piacentini, A. Ratkus, T. Torims, J. Vilcans
    Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
  • L. Sabbatini, A. Vannozzi
    LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy
  • S. Uberti
    Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
 
  Funding: This study was (partially) supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 101008548 (HITRIplus).
The Heavy Ion Therapy Research Integration plus (HITRIplus) is a European project that aims to integrate and propel research and technologies related to cancer treatment with heavy ions beams. Among the ambitious goals of the project, a specific work package includes the design of a gantry for carbon ions, based on superconducting magnets. The first milestone to achieve is the choice of the fundamental gantry parameters, namely the beam optics layout, the superconducting magnet technology, and the main user requirements. Starting from a reference 3T design, the collaboration widely explored dozens of possible gantry configurations at 4T, aiming to find the best compromise in terms of footprint, capital cost, and required R&D. We present here a summary of these configurations, underlying the initial correlation between the beam optics, the mechanics, and the main superconducting dipoles design: the bending field (up to 4 T), combined function features (integrated quadrupole), magnet aperture (up to 90 mm), and angular length (30°-45°). The resulting main parameters are then listed, compared, and used to drive the choice of the best gantry layout to be developed in HITRIplus.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-THPOMS012  
About • Received ※ 20 May 2022 — Revised ※ 12 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 13 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 16 June 2022
Cite • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)