Paper |
Title |
Page |
MOPOMS042 |
Comparison Between Run 2 TID Measurements and FLUKA Simulations in the CERN LHC Tunnel of the Atlas Insertion Region |
732 |
|
- D. Prelipcean, K. Biłko, F. Cerutti, A. Ciccotelli, D. Di Francesca, R. García Alía, B. Humann, G. Lerner, D. Ricci, M. Sabaté-Gilarte
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
- B. Humann
TU Vienna, Wien, Austria
|
|
|
In this paper we present a systematic benchmark between the simulated and the measured data for the radiation monitors useful for Radiation to Electronics (R2E) studies at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. For this purpose, the radiation levels in the main LHC tunnel on the right side of the Interaction Point 1 (ATLAS detector) are simulated using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code and compared against Total Ionising Dose (TID) measurements performed with the Beam Loss Monitoring (BLM) system, and 180 m of Distributed Optical Fibre Radiation Sensor (DOFRS). Considering the complexity and the scale of the simulations as well as the variety of the LHC operational parameters, we find a generally good agreement between measured and simulated radiation levels, typically within a factor of 2 or better.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-MOPOMS042
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 08 June 2022 — Revised ※ 23 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 26 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 09 July 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
MOPOMS043 |
Automated Analysis of the Prompt Radiation Levels in the CERN Accelerator Complex |
736 |
|
- K. Biłko, R. García Alía, J.B. Potoine
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
|
|
|
The CERN injector complex is essential in providing high-energy beams to various experiments and to the world’s largest accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Beam losses linked to its operation result in a mixed radiation field which, through both cumulative and single-event effects poses a threat to the electronic equipment exposed in the tunnel. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the radiation distribution and evolution is necessary in order to implement adequate Radiation to Electronics mitigation and prevention measures, resulting in an improvement of the accelerator efficiency and availability. In this study, we present the automated analysis scheme put in place to efficiently process and visualise the radiation data produced by various radiation monitors, distributed at the four largest CERN accelerators, namely the Proton Synchrotron Booster, Proton Synchrotron, Super Proton Synchrotron, and the LHC, where a proton beam is accelerated gradually from 160 MeV up to 7 TeV.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-MOPOMS043
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 07 June 2022 — Revised ※ 13 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 17 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 30 June 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
MOPOMS044 |
Implications and Mitigation of Radiation Effects on the CERN SPS Operation during 2021 |
740 |
|
- Y.Q. Aguiar, A. Apollonio, K. Biłko, M. Brucoli, M. Cecchetto, S. Danzeca, R. García Alía, T. Ladzinski, G. Lerner, J.B. Potoine, A. Zimmaro
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
|
|
|
During the Long Shutdown 2 (LS2, 2019-2020), the CERN accelerator complex has undergone major upgrades, mainly in preparation for the High-Luminosity (HL) LHC era, the ultimate capacity for its physics production. Therefore, several novel equipment and systems were designed and deployed throughout the accelerator complex. To comply with the radiation level specifications and avoid machine downtime due to radiation effects, the electronics systems exposed to radiation need to follow Radiation Hardness Assurance (RHA) methodologies developed and validated by the Radiation to Electronics (R2E) project at CERN. However, the establishment of such procedures is not yet fully implemented in the LHC injector chain, and some R2E failures were detected in the SPS during the 2021 operation. This work is devoted to describing and analysing the R2E failures and their impact on operation, in the context of the related radiation levels and equipment sensitivity.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-MOPOMS044
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 07 June 2022 — Revised ※ 21 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 26 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 08 July 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
WEPOST012 |
Feasibility of Slow-Extracted High-Energy Ions From the CERN Proton Synchrotron for CHARM |
1703 |
|
- M.A. Fraser, P.A. Arrutia Sota, K. Biłko, N. Charitonidis, S. Danzeca, M. Delrieux, M. Duraffourg, N. Emriskova, L.S. Esposito, R. García Alía, A. Guerrero, O. Hans, G.I. Imesch, E.P. Johnson, G. Lerner, I. Ortega Ruiz, G. Pezzullo, D. Prelipcean, F. Ravotti, F. Roncarolo, A. Waets
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
|
|
|
The CHARM High-energy Ions for Micro Electronics Reliability Assurance (CHIMERA) working group at CERN is investigating the feasibility of delivering high energy ion beams to the CHARM facility for the study of radiation effects to electronics components engineered to operate in harsh radiation environments, such as space or high-energy accelerators. The Proton Synchrotron has the potential of delivering the required high energy and high-Z (in this case, Pb) ions for radiation tests over the relevant range of Linear Energy Transfer of ~ 10 - 40 MeV cm2/mg with a > 1 mm penetration depth in silicon, specifically for single event effect tests. This contribution summarises the working group’s progress in demonstrating the feasibility of variable energy slow extraction and over a wide range of intensities. The results of a dedicated 6 GeV/u Pb ion beam test are reported to understand the performance limitations of the beam instrumentation systems needed to characterise the beam in CHARM.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-WEPOST012
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 02 June 2022 — Revised ※ 14 June 2022 — Accepted ※ 15 June 2022 — Issue date ※ 23 June 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|